B Technical
Audit of Water Companies
- Describing the technical audit process for checking water
companies' compliance with the Drinking Water Quality Regulations
in force during the year 2002.
|
The Technical Audit Process
Although the key elements of the technical audit process remain the
same as those introduced in 1990, the detailed application of the process
is kept under continuous review. During 2002 the major part of the technical
audit process was carried out by teams of Inspectors. Consultants, acting
as Temporary Technical Assessors and working under the general direction
of an Inspector, carried out a number of the audit inspection tasks.
All audit inspections are tailored to the individual water company,
and a number of core tasks are carried out for every company. The inspection
tasks covered for one or more companies in 2002 are listed in Table
1 below.
* Task carried out for all companies
(a) Task allocated to consultants
In 2002, all 26 companies were inspected by a combination of visits,
and assessment of information and documents provided by them. The inspection
programme generally ran smoothly and the Inspectorate continues to be
grateful to companies for providing full facilities to its staff and
consultants. The Inspectorate is continuing to move towards using detailed
checklists for each inspection task, which can be completed in draft
and presented to the company soon after the inspection visit. This approach
is both effective and efficient in terms of communicating the outcome
of the inspection to the company. Each inspection report summarises
the findings of the inspection, along with the main conclusions and
any recommendations made. Where relevant, inspection report summaries
are available in the 'Business and Technical' section of the Inspectorate's
web site under 'Audit and Inspection'.
A clear distinction is made in the inspection reports between recommendations,
which require a formal written response from the company, and suggestions.
Recommendations are made only where, in the Inspector's opinion, action
is required in order to avoid a foreseeable risk of a breach of a regulatory
duty. If such a breach has occurred then enforcement action may be considered.
Suggestions are made in relation to matters which do not present such
a risk, but which concern general good practice.
|