C Events
Affecting Water Quality
- Investigating events that affect, or potentially affect, the
quality of drinking water supplies
- Learning lessons and preventing events from recurring
- Taking necessary action against water companies
- 398 events notified in 2002
|
Water companies are required to report all water
quality problems to the Inspectorate
The Water Undertakers (Information) Direction 1998 (the 'Information
Direction') requires water companies to inform the Inspectorate of all
events that have affected, or are likely to affect, drinking water quality,
or sufficiency of supplies and where, as a result, there may be a risk
to consumers' health.
Companies are required to notify the Inspectorate as soon as possible
of any events which, in their opinion, meet the criteria set down in
the Information Direction.
DWI Information Letter 13/99 provides further guidance on these criteria.
Notified events must be confirmed in writing within 72 hours, and
a full report must be provided within one month for all events deemed
by the Inspectorate to be incidents.
Companies are also encouraged to notify the Inspectorate of events
not meeting the prescribed criteria, but which could impact on water
quality or cause concern to consumers.
Water quality events are classified according to the following definitions:
| Event
Any occurrence which by its nature is required to be notified
under the Information Direction. Water companies have to use their
judgement in any particular set of circumstances.
Incident
A sub-set of events defined by the Inspectorate to include:
- non-trivial and unexpected breach of Part II of the Regulations;
or
- a breach of Part VI of the Regulations; or
- an unusual deterioration in water quality; or
- a significant risk to the health of consumers; or
- adverse water quality changes perceived by consumers as significant;
or
- a cause for significant media interest.
Non-incident
All other event notifications not classified as incidents. |
Full text of the Water Undertakers (Information) Direction 1998 (included
in DWI Information Letter 4/98) and DWI Information Letter 13/99 can
be found on the web site at www.dwi.gov.uk
The Inspectorate assesses every event and, if
required, takes action against water companies
The Assessment - Inspectors assess the water company's 72 hour
report to determine whether the event is an incident. If the event is
deemed to be an incident a 30 day report may also be required. The Inspector
assesses all the information available to determine:
- what caused the problem and whether or not it was avoidable;
- what the company did in response and how it handled the incident;
- what lessons can be learned to prevent similar incidents in the
future;
- if there were any breaches of enforceable regulations; and
- whether the company supplied water during the incident that was
unfit for human consumption.
The Outcome - This table summarises the typical outcomes of assessments
based on the severity of the problem and the actions taken as a result.
| Outcome of Assessment |
Action Taken |
No breaches of regulations.
Company acted appropriately in response to the problem. |
Letter of assessment is sent to the company and copied
to the relevant local and district health authorities, and to OFWAT,
and if appropriate, to the Welsh Assembly Government (the Assembly
Government) |
| Breaches of regulations and/or deficiencies in response. |
Letter of assessment to the company, including recommendations
for action which the company must take to address problems which
the incident exposed. The relevant local and district health authorities,
and OFWAT are informed of the outcome, as appropriate. as is the
Assembly Government. |
| Significant or repeated breaches of enforceable regulations. |
Enforcement action initiated against the company. A legal process
to ensure that the company takes all necessary action to prevent
further breaches. The relevant local and district health authorities,
and OFWAT are informed of the outcome, as appropriate, as is the
Assembly Government. |
| Supply of water unfit for human consumption as a result of either
deficiencies in the company's response or failings in its actions. |
Initiation of either prosecution proceedings against the company
or the issue of a formal caution for a criminal offence. The relevant
local and district health authorities, and OFWAT are informed of
the outcome, as appropriate, as is the Assembly Government. |
More detail on the assessment process is available on the web site
www.dwi.gov.uk. This also includes a flow diagram which illustrates
the process and time-scale in which incidents and non-incidents are
managed by water companies and the Inspectorate respectively.
Details of events notified and assessments made
during 2002
Brief descriptions of all incidents are given in the relevant individual
company sections in Part 2 of this report. A total of 112 incidents
which affected, or were likely to affect, the quality of water supplied
to approximately 2.2 million consumers, were notified to the Inspectorate
during 2002. The period during which water quality was actually compromised
ranged from a few hours to several days. In addition, 286 notifications
were made which were classified as non-incidents.
The Inspectorate aims to complete its assessments within three months
of notification. Therefore any events notified towards the end of the
calendar year might be assessed in the next calendar year. Also, if
prosecution proceedings are being considered, the assessment will not
be completed until such proceedings have been concluded. Thus at 31
March 2003, a total of 16 (14 from 2002 and 2 pre-2002) assessments
were outstanding.
The following table summarises the Inspectorate's position on 31 March
2003 in assessing the incidents and non-incidents notified under the
Information Direction.
| Incidents Notified in 2002: |
112 |
| Non-Incidents Notified in 2002: |
286 |
| Total Number of Events notified in 2002 |
398 |
| |
|
| 2002 Events Assessed: |
384 |
| No action required: |
311 |
| Recommendations: |
73 |
| Enforcement Action: |
0 |
| Caution: |
0 |
| Prosecutions: |
0 |
| Pre- 2002 Events Assessed in 2002: |
105 |
| No action required: |
69 |
| Recommendations: |
35 |
| Enforcement Action: |
0 |
| Caution: |
1 |
| Prosecutions: |
0 |
| Total Number of Assessments Completed in 2002 |
489 |
| |
|
| 2002 Assessments Outstanding: |
14 |
| Pre-2002 Assessments Outstanding: |
2 |
| Total Number of Assessments Outstanding |
16 |
Incidents are categorised by the nature, origin and effect of the
problem. The chart below provides a breakdown and a four-year comparison
(1999 - 2002) of incident categories.
The total number of notifications made to the Inspectorate during
2002 has decreased from the number made in 2001. The number of notifications
that have been considered as incidents also decreased in 2002.
It should be noted that following completion of assessment by the
Inspectorate, a few of the events initially classified as incidents
might subsequently be re-classified as non-incidents, and vice versa.
Companies prosecuted or cautioned for supplying
water unfit for human consumption
There were no prosecutions of water companies during the 2002 reporting
period. In January 2003 the Inspectorate issued a formal caution to
Yorkshire Water Services relating to an incident in which discoloured
water was supplied in the Sandygates area of Sheffield in June 2001.
Summary of Incidents and Prosecutions 1999 -
2002
The following table gives the number of prosecutions and cautions
that have taken place following the Inspectorate's investigation of
incidents, which were concluded between 1999 and 2002. It also shows
the number of court cases pending, and the number of incidents that
are still under consideration as at 31 March 2003. In studying the table
it is important to take into account the following:
- the number of incidents occurring can be expected to be approximately
proportional to the size of the water company, and particularly the
length of the distribution system;
- companies with no incidents in these categories are not included
in the table;
- many are minor incidents affecting a small number of consumers;
- many of the incidents occur for reasons outside the control of
water companies, e.g. a burst main;
- prosecution cases can take at least a year to get to court so they
do not necessarily reflect the position today.
Water Company Incidents and Prosecutions 1999-2002
Water company
|
Population
supplied |
Km of
mains |
No of incidents
notified in
year |
Prosecutions
(cautions)
completed
in
year |
Court
cases
pending
at
31/03/03 |
Incidents
still under
investigation
as at
31/03/03 |
| |
|
|
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
|
[+] Pre 2002 |
| Anglian |
4,100,000 |
35,995 |
16 |
18 |
14 |
21 |
2 |
- |
1 |
- |
0 |
3 |
| Bristol Water |
1,086,000 |
6,500 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0 |
0 |
| Bournemouth and W Hants |
432,000 |
2,800 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0 |
0 |
| Cambridge Water |
291,700 |
2,197 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0 |
0 |
| Dee Valley |
258,500 |
1,953 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0 |
0 |
| Dwr Cymru |
2,800,000 |
24,900 |
9 |
11 |
15 |
12 |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
0 |
1 |
| Essex & Suffolk |
1,700,000 |
8,393 |
5 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0 |
1 |
| Folkestone & Dover |
163,300 |
1,101 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0 |
0 |
| Hartlepool |
91,000 |
513 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0 |
0 |
| Mid Kent |
574,700 |
4,167 |
4 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
- |
1 |
1(1) |
- |
0 |
0 |
| Northumbrian |
2,600,000 |
16,687 |
12 |
11 |
21 |
14 |
- |
(1) |
- |
- |
0 |
1 |
| Portsmouth |
647,000 |
3,200 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0 |
0 |
| Severn Trent |
7,360,000 |
41,000 |
20 |
19 |
5 |
2 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
0 |
0 |
| South East |
1,400,000 |
9,663 |
4 |
7 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
- |
- |
- |
0 |
0 |
| South Staffs |
1,200,000 |
5,828 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0 |
0 |
| South West |
1,500,000 |
15,000 |
4 |
7 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
- |
- |
- |
0 |
1 [+1] |
| Southern |
2,260,000 |
13,350 |
2 |
3 |
7 |
9 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0 |
2 |
| Sutton & East Surrey |
637,000 |
3,373 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
- |
(1) |
- |
- |
0 |
0[+1] |
| Tendring |
145,000 |
910 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0 |
0 |
| Thames |
7,900,000 |
31,400 |
13 |
7 |
7 |
7 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
0 |
0 |
| Three Valleys |
2,900,000 |
13,500 |
10 |
9 |
11 |
6 |
- |
(1) |
- |
- |
0 |
0 |
| United Utilities |
6,800,000 |
42,200 |
27 |
16 |
18 |
9 |
2 |
3(4) |
- |
- |
0 |
5 |
| Wessex |
1,200,000 |
10,800 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
- |
(1) |
- |
- |
0 |
0 |
| Yorkshire |
4,710,000 |
31,000 |
27 |
16 |
12 |
10 |
- |
4 |
1(4) |
(1) |
0 |
0 |
| TOTAL |
52,756,200 |
326,430 |
166 |
139 |
138 |
112 |
10(0) |
8(8) |
4(5) |
(1) |
0 |
14[+2] |
|