G The
Cryptosporidium Regulations
- Following major outbreaks of water-related cryptosporidiosis
in Torbay in 1995, and north London and Hertfordshire in 1997,
new Regulations were introduced in 1999 to ensure drinking water
was treated adequately to remove Cryptosporidium oocysts.
- These Regulations are now part of the Water Supply (Water
Quality) Regulations 20001 (the new Regulations).
|
The Regulations
The Water Supply (Water Quality) (Amendment) Regulations 1999 (the
1999 Regulations) came into force on 30 June 1999. These have been incorporated
as regulations 27, 28 and 29 in the new Regulations and came into force
on 1 January 2001 in England and 1 January 2002 in Wales
The Regulations set a treatment standard of an average of less than
one oocyst in 10 litres of water supplied from a treatment works. The
standard does not take into account different species of Cryptosporidium,
nor whether any oocysts detected are viable, i.e. alive and potentially
able to cause infection.
It is an offence to contravene the standard, subject to a defence
by the company that it took all reasonable steps and exercised all due
diligence to avoid committing the offence.
The Regulations specify continuous sampling of not less than 40 litres
per hour of treated water going into supply at all sites where there
is a significant risk of the treatment standard being contravened. The
Regulations also specify the conditions that have to be met for the
collection and analysis of the samples taken, and the reporting of the
results, and it is an offence, subject to the same defence as above,
if these conditions are not met.
Implementing the Regulations
Water companies were required to carry out a risk assessment for each
of their water treatment works by 30 September 1999. New works must
be assessed before they can be brought into use. Guidance on the risk
assessment was issued with the 1999 Regulations and can be found on
the Inspectorate's web site.
The guidance identified factors that contribute towards the assessment
of significant risk, i.e. the quality of the source water; the catchment;
whether direct abstraction, or abstraction with storage of less than
seven days from a river or stream, was involved; any evidence of rapid
surface water connection to an aquifer used for groundwater abstraction;
the type of treatment provided; and any past history of an unexplained
outbreak of drinking-water-related cryptosporidiosis, where no specific
action had been taken to prevent recurrence. All risk assessments were
checked by the Inspectorate to establish whether there was a significant
risk of contravening the standard.
The significant risk classification does not imply a contravention
of the standard, but rather that there is potential for a significant
number of Cryptosporidium oocysts to be present at times in the treated
water.
For works identified as at significant risk, water companies must
treat the water to ensure that the standard is met. They must also demonstrate
compliance by continuously monitoring the water leaving the works and
reporting the results of the daily analysis to the Inspectorate. All
regulatory sample points were audited at least once during 2002.
The initial risk assessments identified 332 sites as being at significant
risk. Of these, 158 sites were works treating surface waters and the
remaining 174 sites were groundwater abstractions. Water companies may
submit new risk assessments to the Inspectorate if they believe a site
is no longer at significant risk, for example when a new treatment process
has been installed and is operating successfully.
The treatment processes at sites of significant risk should be operated
and maintained at an appropriate level to meet the standard. As an alternative
to continuous monitoring, a water company may install a treatment process
capable of continuously removing or retaining particles greater than
one-micron diameter. The company then has to demonstrate to the Inspectorate
the efficacy of the process.
In cases where suitable treatment cannot be installed, companies are
either abandoning sites of significant risk, or are combining sources
for treatment at another works with an appropriate level of treatment.
Improvement Programmes
Where a site has been identified as being at significant risk and
the current treatment is considered to be inadequate, the Inspectorate
agreed an improvement programme with the water company for appropriate
treatment to be installed, or for the source to be abandoned or changed.
Until treatment is installed or other action taken, water companies
are encouraged to monitor the treated water continuously and report
these operational results to the Inspectorate. However, these data are
not included in the regulatory results reported below.
At the beginning of 2002, 17 companies had 145 improvement programmes
of work in place for the removal of Cryptosporidium oocysts. Sixty-one
of the programmes were due for completion during 2002. Thirty-nine were
completed on or close to schedule, 11 were delayed due to circumstances
outside the company's control and 11 programmes were subject to review
in respect of their risk assessments. A further six schemes carried
over from preceding years were also completed during 2002. The Inspectorate
is monitoring progress with delivery of the ongoing programmes.
One company also had 16 undertakings in place for Cryptosporidium
removal schemes. Six of these schemes were due for completion during
2002 and two of these schemes were completed ahead of schedule. The
other four schemes were delayed for reasons outside the company's control.
Three of these schemes were completed by the end of the year and the
fourth required a new undertaking to be submitted.
Analysis of Samples
The protocol issued with the 1999 Regulations sets out the requirements
for the laboratory facilities and analytical method that must be used
for compliance testing. Analysis can only be carried out at laboratories
approved by the Inspectorate and these are subject to both announced
and unannounced inspections. During 2002 each of the approved laboratories
has had at least one announced and/or one unannounced audit.
Samples must be analysed within three days of being taken, unless
there has been a significant increase in the turbidity of the water
being sampled, or there is some other indication that the number of
Cryptosporidium oocysts in the water may have increased. In this case,
analysis must be completed within a day of the sample being taken.
Strict rules are laid down for all aspects of sampling and analysis.
These rules ensure that suitable chains of evidence are available as
testimony, if required, in a court of law. Full details of all the approved
procedures are available on the Inspectorate's web site.
Sample Results in 2002
During 2002, 47,049 regulatory samples were taken from 149 sites.
Very low numbers of oocysts were detected in 893 (1.88%) samples taken
from 102 (68.5%) sites.
Most of the detections were in the range 0.01 - 0.10 oocysts
per 10 litres. The regulatory standard was not contravened at any site
during 2002. The Inspectorate is unaware of any outbreaks of cryptosporidiosis
associated with the water supplied from those water treatment works
identified as being at significant risk.
The monitoring results clearly demonstrate that treated drinking water
is not a major source of exposure of the population to Cryptosporidium
oocysts.
The treatment standard and continuous monitoring for Cryptosporidium
that is in place in England and Wales is unique in the world. The large
amount of data that is collected allows the Inspectorate and the water
industry to demonstrate, confidently, that well-operated, conventional
physical-barrier water treatment enables drinking water to meet the
required treatment standard for Cryptosporidium.
1 The Water Supply (Water Quality) Regulations 2001
in Wales.
|