Drinking Water Inspectorate logo

Drinking Water 1999

A report by the Chief Inspector
Drinking Water Inspectorate


Dwr Cymru Cyfyngedig

Introduction

Dwr Cymru Cyfyngedig supplies on average about 1000 Ml/d of water to about 2.8 million consumers in an area covering most of Wales and parts of Hereford and Worcester. and Gloucestershire. Approximately 59% of the Company's water supplies come from impounding reservoirs, 35% from river abstractions and 6% from boreholes and springs. The Company has 111 treatment works on 111 sites, and distributes water through 24,900 km of pipes and 572 service reservoirs to 184 water supply zones. In addition there is a small bulk supply from Severn Trent Water Limited.

Overall water quality

At water treatment works and service reservoirs and in water supply zones, the Company carried out a total of 180,729 determinations in 1999. Of these, 99.8% demonstrated compliance with the relevant PCV, but 423 showed a contravention to have occurred.

Coliforms were not detected at 103 (93%) of the Company's 111 water treatment works. At 571 (>99%) of the Company's 572 service reservoirs, coliforms were absent from at least 95% of samples. Of the Company's 184 water supply zones in 1999, 178 (97%) complied fully with the relevant water quality standards or had breaches of the standards which were either trivial or were fully covered by undertakings. In the other 6 (3%) of the zones, some breaches have resulted in consideration of enforcement action.

Microbiological quality of water leaving treatment works

The Company complied with the sampling frequencies required by regulation 17 at all its treatment works in 1999.

Table 7.1 shows the Company's performance in 1999, with data for 1998 and 1997 for comparison. There have been significant decreases over the three years in the number of treatment works, and samples from treatment works, in which coliforms or faecal coliforms were detected. Other differences between the three years are not considered significant.

Table 7.1 Dwr Cymru Cyfyngedig
MICROBIOLOGICAL QUALITY OF WATER LEAVING TREATMENT WORKS
 
  1999 1998 1997
Number of water treatment works111111119
Works with no sampling shortfall111111116
       
COLIFORMS      
Total number of determinations14,64715,31916,089
- number containing coliforms102260
- % containing coliforms0.10.10.4
Treatment works with coliforms detected81836
- % of all works71630
       
FAECAL COLIFORMS      
Total number of determinations14,64715,31916,088
number containing faecal coliforms0516
- % containing faecal coliforms0.0<0.10.1
Treatment works with faecal coliforms detected0513
- % of all works0511

 

Contraventions of the microbiological quality standards at one works have resulted in the consideration of enforcement action, as shown in table 7.4. All other contraventions of the standards at works are considered trivial.

Microbiological quality of water in service reservoirs

The Company complied with the sampling frequencies required by regulation 18 at all of its service reservoirs in 1999.

Table 7.2 shows the Company's performance in 1999, with data for 1998 and 1997 for comparison. There have been significant decreases over the three years in the number of service reservoirs, and samples from service reservoirs, in which coliforms or faecal coliforms were detected. Other differences between the three years are not considered significant.

Contraventions of the microbiological quality standards at two service reservoirs have resulted in the consideration of enforcement action, as shown in table 7.4. All other contraventions of the standards at service reservoirs are considered trivial.

Table 7.2 Dwr Cymru Cyfyngedig
MICROBIOLOGICAL QUALITY OF WATER IN SERVICE RESERVOIRS
 
  1999 1998 1997
Number of service reservoirs572597611
Service reservoirs with no sampling shortfall572595608
       
COLIFORMS      
Total number of determinations30,46130,91531,939
- number containing coliforms5974161
- % containing coliforms0.20.20.5
Service reservoirs with coliforms detected5364132
Service reservoirs with coliforms detected in
more than 5% of samples
126
- % of all service reservoirs0.20.31
       
FAECAL COLIFORMS      
Total number of determinations30,46130,91631,941
- number containing faecal coliforms171839
- % containing faecal coliforms0.10.10.1
Service reservoirs with faecal coliforms detected151637
- % of all service reservoirs336

 

Water quality in water supply zones

The Company complied with the required sampling frequencies for all parameters in all zones.

Table 7.3 shows the Company's performance in 1999, with data for 1998 and 1997 for comparison. There has been a significant decrease over the three years in the number of zones contravening the standard for faecal coliforms, and a significant increase for trihalomethanes. All other differences between the three years are not considered significant.

Enforcement action is being considered in respect of some contraventions of standards, as shown in tables 7.3 and 7.4. All other contraventions of the standards in zones are considered trivial or are covered by undertakings.

Table 7.3 Dwr Cymru Cyfyngedig
WATER QUALITY IN SUPPLY ZONES
 
Columns 'CBU' show, for determinations, contraventions covered by undertakings and, for zones, the total number of zones covered by undertakings in 1999. Column 'E' shows the number of zones for which new enforcement action is under consideration as a result of contraventions of the PCV in 1999. Please refer to the Introduction to Part 2 for more detailed explanation of this table.
 
PARAMETER DETERMINATIONS in 1999 ZONES (184 in 1999)*
Total Contravening PCV   Non-compliant
No. % CBU CBU E Number in:
  1999 1999 1998 1997
Coliforms9,432330.4000013
Faecal coliforms9,4332<0.10002415
Colour98800.0010000
Turbidity1,09010.111790121
Odour1,38730.2000346
Taste1,38110.1000165
Hydrogen ion1,18250.4331321
Nitrate91000.0000000
Nitrite1,9541236.391260302827
Aluminium1,15430.30430345
Iron2,660622.3601870374960
Manganese1,51590.6762081511
Lead51630.60103811
PAH1,019676.651720333438
Trihalomethanes779121.5335641
Total pesticides1,16220.2000212
Asulam79300.0000010
Atrazine75120.3000210
2,4-D62810.2000121
2,4-DB62700.0000011
Carbendazim55910.2000100
Linuron74610.1000100
MCPA63110.2000111
MCPB62100.0000001
Mecoprop62310.2000122
Mancozeb56810.2010103
rietazine74800.0000001
Other pesticides23,76600.0000000
Antimony20300.0000003
Benzo-3,4-pyrene1,01920.2000000
Oxidizability19210.5000101
Temperature9,31400.0000001
Zinc21300.0000001
All others11,94900.0000000
TOTAL90,5133370.4216-----
*189 zones in 1998; 200 zones in 1997.

 

Inspection

Mr A Hallas, Inspector, carried out an inspection of the Company during September 1999.

He concluded that:

  1. the Company has made appropriate and positive response to the recommendations and consideration of enforcement made in 1998 report;

  2. based on the audit trails of selected compliance results, the Company continued to have general arrangements for sampling which satisfy Parts IV and V of the Regulations and satisfactory and secure arrangements for reporting compliance information; and

  3. several deficiencies were identified relating to sampling and performance of the analytical methods.

    Between September and November 1999, Consultants Binnie, Black and Veatch, working under the direction of Mr W M Waite, Principal Inspector, carried out an audit of the Company's procedures for operation and management of the distribution system. Based on their report Mr Waite concluded that:

  4. the Company has procedures which cover most aspects of the operation and maintenance of their distribution network. These procedures are generally clear. However, some of the procedures lack detail on how the operations should be implemented and the criteria by which decisions should be made. In particular procedures could give further guidance with respect to minimising the potential for discolouration of supplies. However, the Company does not have any procedures which address the content of two of the 10 checklists used by the consultants.

    Mr R M Walls, Consultant, working under the direction of Mr W M Waite, Principal Inspector, carried out audits of the Company's responses to the recommendations made by the Group of Experts on Cryptosporidium in Water Supplies in their Third Report (the Bouchier Report) and the incorporation of the Technical Guidance Notes on Water Supply Hygiene into the Company's procedures. Based on his report Mr Waite concluded that:

  5. the Company had generally responded or is responding to the recommendations made in the Bouchier report. A few areas were identified where the Company's response could be improved. The Company generally has procedures which incorporate the Technical Guidance Notes, but certain practices need to be set down in procedures.

    In October 1999, Parkman Consultants, represented by Mr B Jones, working under the direction of Mr P Halton, Inspector, carried out an audit of the Company's progress with the programme of mains renovation set out in the distribution system Undertaking submitted by the Company. Based on Mr Jones' report, Mr Halton's main conclusions were that:

  6. the objectives of the Undertaking remained valid;

  7. the steps to be taken were defined with adequate precision;

  8. a practicable timetable had been set; and

  9. the Company was likely to meet the target renovation length by the date for completion of the work.

    As a result of these inspections, 19 recommendations were conveyed to the Company for formal response, two thirds of the recommendations resulted from review of procedures for operation and management of the distribution network. Nineteen suggestions on various matters were also made. The Company is taking action or has already taken action on a number of the recommendations.

Improvement programmes

Eight undertakings in respect of improvement programmes were due for full completion or the completion of major steps during 1999 and all of these were completed on schedule.

Incidents

Nine of the events notified during 1999 by the Company to the Secretary of State under the terms of the Water Undertakers (Information) Direction 1998 are regarded by the Inspectorate as constituting incidents in which drinking water quality demonstrably deteriorated.

Of the nine incidents, seven involved the supply of discoloured water, one involved the detection of taste and odour in supply and one was a disinfection failure. Two of the incidents remain under consideration by the Inspectorate.

In February 1999, discoloured water was supplied to the areas of Pembroke and Manorbier, Pembrokshire and to parts of Rhyl, Pensarn and Kinmel Bay in Denbighshire because of burst mains. In July and October 1999, discoloured water was supplied to parts of Milford Haven, Pembrokshire, on the first occasion because of increased demand on the system due to dry weather, and on the second as a result of a burst main. In July 1999 discoloured water was supplied on two occasions to parts of St Asaph, Denbighshire. The first time was caused by a blockage in a newly installed pressure control valve complex (PRV) that disturbed mains deposits in the distribution system. The PRV has since been fitted with an alarm system. The second was a result of high demand on the system which disturbed mains sediment. In November 1999, discoloured water was supplied to areas of Ebbw Vale due to several bursts on a main within two days.

In June 1999, undisinfected water was supplied to four villages in Herefordshire due to a mechanical failure of the chlorine motive water pump at Leintwardine treatment works. A precautionary advice to boil water was issued to consumers. All bacteriological samples taken in distribution were satisfactory.

Between the 2 August and 15 September 1999, there was an earthy taste to the water supply from Bryngwyn Water Treatment Works caused by a naturally occurring metabolite from algae. Enhanced treatment through the addition of Powdered Activated Carbon commenced at the works on 19 August to reduce the level of metabolite entering the water supply. This treatment achieved a reduction in the number of consumer complaints received by the Company of poor tasting water.

No other events regarded as constituting incidents came to the attention of the Inspectorate in 1999.

Enforcement action

Table 7.4 summarises enforcement action under consideration or taken for the Company as a result of the Inspectorate's work in, or pertaining to, the calendar year 1999.

Table 7.4Dwr Cymru Cyfyngedig
SUMMARY OF ENFORCEMENT ACTION CONSIDERED IN 1999
RegulationReason for enforcement
3(3)(c)Contravention of the standard for hydrogen ion in one zone.
3(3)(e)Contravention of the standard for trihalomethanes in five zones.
3(7)Contravention of the coliform standard at one treatment works.
3(7)Contravention of the coliform standard at one service reservoir and the coliforms and faecal coliform standards at one service reservoir.


[ Previous ] [ Contents ] [ Next ]


| A - Z Index | Business and Technical | Consumer Information | Contacting us |
| DWI Home Page | News | Product Approval | Search our site | Wales |

Drinking Water Inspectorate,
Floor 2/A1, Ashdown House, 123 Victoria Street, London, SW1E 6DE
Telephone : 020 7944 5956 - Facsimile : 020 7944 5969
E-mail: dwi_enquiries@detr.gov.uk


Published 12 July 2000; Updated 11 July 2001
Return to Publications and Reports Index
Return to Drinking Water Inspectorate Home Page
Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA)Home Page
The National Assembly for Wales / Cynulliad Cenedlaethol Cymru Home Page
Web site terms
© Crown copyright 2001